As millions of people around the world celebrate the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin millions of others mourn the death culture created by followers of his teaching.  Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” theory has been used as the rational for radical teachings of eugenics, genocide, mass abortion, racism and sexism.  Since the publication of the Origin of Species, the last 150 years have seen more killing than all human history combined and most of it using the principles of Darwinism.

The principal teaching of evolution is based on Charles Darwin¹s book "The Origin of Species". The full title of this book is "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life." Evolution teaches that life has developed from one form to another through the process of survival of the fittest. In other words, that the weak will be exterminated and the strong will live on. As the evolution of man continues, the fit survive and the weak are eliminated.

Darwin developed this theory when he traveled to South America.  After his visit he stated when meeting the simple Indians of Tierra del Fuego, "I could not have believed how wide was the difference between savage and civilized man; it is greater than between a wild and domesticated animal . . . Viewing such a man, one can hardly make oneself believe that they are fellow creatures and inhabitants of the same world."  The very origin of his theory is guttural racism.

Darwin took racism all the way to predictions of genocide. On page 178 in the Descent of Man Darwin states, "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world…The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider,  instead of as now between the negro or Australian (Aboriginals) and the gorilla."  Not only does he teach that Africans and Aboriginals are inferior and close to the gorilla, he teaches that the superior White man will survive and exterminate the less fit.

Many world leaders accepted Darwin’s teaching and have used it for devious purposes.  Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels greatly admired Darwin’s theory and used it the development of the Communist Manifesto.  Marx wrote to Engels saying “Darwin's book is very important and serves me as a natural-scientific basis for the class struggle in history.”  Darwin offered teaching that negated the existence of God, therefore, Marx had a scientific foundation to present a communist society that outlawed religion.  Vladimir Lenin launched Soviet Union based on Marx and Engels plan.

 Adolf Hitler was an avid evolutionist and followed Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton's theory of human evolution. Galton founded "Eugenics" and taught that men who inherited superior characteristics would ultimately eradicate the lesser developed humans. Hitler then went on to mass sterilize those whom he found to be inferior and ultimately exterminate millions of people based on the theory of evolution. This type of insanity is the natural progression of the evil teaching of racism.

There is only one race, the human race. We are all people and deserve to be treated as such. We cannot teach our children to look at others as members of a different race but of another family. Yes, families are slightly different but that is what makes us all beautiful to one another. We need to concentrate on our similarities and celebrate our differences.

He did show a certain disdain for "savages," professing that he felt more akin to certain altruistic tendencies in monkeys than he did to "a savage who delights to torture his enemies."

Since the day when the teachings of Darwin permeated schools there have been over 750 million babies exterminated by abortion worldwide. When will we stop the carnage?

The textbooks your children study today include the incredulous teaching by Charles Darwin of  "Recapitulation." This is the theory that a baby developing in the womb is actually re-enacting evolution. Darwinists teach that the baby is not human until fully developed at birth, thus concluding that the baby in the womb is sub-human and, therefore, can be killed. The result is mass murder of the unborn without affecting our conscience.

During the early 70's, when abortion laws were eradicated, Carl Sagan widely propagated the recapitulation theory and said "We must decide what distinguishes a human being from other animals and when, during gestation, the uniquely human qualities--whatever they are-- emerge." He compared the appearance of the developing embryo to "a segmented worm" and added that "something like the gill arches of a fish or an amphibian... become conspicuous, and there is a pronounced tail." The face becomes "reptilian...(then) somewhat pig-like." Eventually, it "resembles a primate, but is still not quite human.” As crazy as this sounds, the teaching managed to desensitize our society to the killing of a baby who we deem is sub-human.

The unfortunate reality is that this evolutionary teaching rules the day. Our laws still treat babies in the womb as sub-human, therefore they have no protection in Canada. Day after day this nonsense is taught to our children in school and will continue to be taught until we do something about it.

Another example of the immoral teachings of evolution is found in the description of  "Down" syndrome children. Dr. Down believed the children had not fully "recapitulated" or evolved as a Caucasian in the mother's womb and, therefore, referred to them as "Mongoloid". Such terminology only reveals the ignorance of such thought and the true racist nature of the teaching.

The most prolific abortionist organization is Planned Parenthood. Ms. Margaret Sanger was an avid evolutionist who founded this organization and believed abortion could advance the human race. In one of her letters Ms. Sanger wrote the "lack of balance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit'" as "the greatest present menace to civilization." Ms. Sanger believed if she could provide abortion services to those whom she believed were "unfit", then mankind would be purified. Planned Parenthood has gone on to exterminate hundreds of thousands of babies mostly paid for by tax dollars.

Recently the Calgary Sun published an article referencing a study conducted by University researchers in the United States. Their mission was to investigate the recent decline in the crime rate. After much investigation they concluded that the cause of the reduction of crime was due to one main factor, abortion. They cite that the killing of 34 million babies most of whom would have been born to minorities, the poor, teenagers or unwed mothers, reduced the number of criminals thus reducing the crime rate. I guess Ms. Sanger's organization is living up to her plans.

When are we going to arise from our slumber and stop such lunacy? A baby in its mother's womb is the most precious thing on earth and is not sub-human. It is a baby, not a fetus or an embryo. It is a baby, not a worm, a reptile or a primate. Let's stop playing with semantics hoping to sooth our conscience. It is pure barbarism to abandon the most helpless. If we aspire to be civilized then we must be civil to babies.

If we stop teaching the destructive principles of evolution to our children then we will see change. Do you want to see your child become a racist? Of course not, so demand he or she not be taught evolution. Do you want to see your child involved with abortion? Of course, not, therefore I urge you to protest the teaching of evolution and recapitulation in your local school. If you don't stop them, then who will?

One of the most offensive teachings of evolution is its severe sexism.   As we continue to teach this abhorrent philosophy to our children we will see more and more degradation of woman in our society, even beyond the current depths of debauchery oozing out of Hollywood.  Each day the teachings of Charles Darwin and other prominent evolutionists are forced upon our children without consideration of the consequences.

The writings of Charles Darwin teach that women are biologically inferior to men. Darwin states that some of the traits of women "are characteristic of the lower races, and are therefore of a past and lower state of civilization". Darwin concludes that man attains,  “. . a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison.” 

Darwin’s theory of natural selection as the process for progress of a species places the developmental responsibility on the male; therefore, man is further developed than woman. The stronger, more fit man will out do the weaker man and win the woman, ultimately producing stronger offspring, contributing to the evolution of man.  This conclusion that the woman plays little or no part in development leads to the belief that women have not evolved as far as man.

Evolutionists also teach that the woman resembles an eleven-year-old male therefore is clearly lesser developed than man is. This type of superficial conclusion only reveals the ignorance of so-called scientists that propagate such nonsense.  They obviously do not look beyond outward appearance and have no understanding of women.

Another “brain storm” of evolution is that women are over burdened by strong senses to the point that they have no ability to develop intellectually.  Evolutionists compare women to lesser developed species like dogs that have such strong noses that their minds are constantly overwhelmed by the sense of smell, so that they cannot progress mentally.  This is utter nonsense and highly offensive to all mankind.

Even more outrageous is the teaching of evolution that intellect is related to brain size and therefore women are intellectually inferior.  Recently Time Magazine focused on new archaeological discoveries of skulls with numerous references to cranium size.  Scientists continue to teach this theory even though it has been categorically proven to be false.   All sociology students study the writings of Gustave Le Bon. This scientist wrote that even in “. . . the most intelligent races . . . are a large number of women whose brains are closer in size to those of gorillas than to the most developed male brains. This inferiority is so obvious that no one can contest it for a moment; only its degree is worth discussion. . . . Women . . . represent the most inferior forms of human evolution and . . . are closer to children and savages than to an adult, civilized man. They excel in fickleness, inconsistency, absence of thought and logic, and incapacity to reason.”

This type of sexist teaching is not only detestable but against the hate laws of Canada yet Darwin’s ridiculous theory is taught regularly in schools across Canada.  Why would a so-called civilized society teach its children such utter disrespect for women? Why do we allow this type of teaching to dominate our classrooms?  We must put a stop to this type of teaching in our schools and demand that our educational systems exalt the role of women in society.